From: Operculum PIT tagging: a viable alternative to avoid human consumption in processed salmon
Estimate | Std. error | z value | p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mortality | ||||
Intercept | − 3.24 | 3.25 | −1.00 | 0.318 |
Weight | − 0.01 | 0.00 | − 2.66 | 0.008* |
PIT location (opercula) | 0.30 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.580 |
K | 1.73 | 2.80 | 0.62 | 0.537 |
Treatment (deliced) | 1.49 | 1.04 | 1.43 | 0.152 |
Tag loss | ||||
Intercept | − 1.00 | 1.14 | − 0.88 | 0.380 |
Weight | − 0.01 | 0.00 | − 3.34 | 0.001* |
PIT location (opercula) | 0.57 | 0.39 | 1.46 | 0.144 |
K | 0.74 | 0.48 | 1.53 | 0.127 |
Treatment (deliced) | − 0.10 | 0.44 | − 0.24 | 0.814 |
Estimate | Std. Error | t value | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Welfare score | ||||
Intercept | 0.58 | 0.09 | 6.82 | < 0.001* |
Weight | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.59 | 0.559 |
PIT location (opercula) | 0.00 | 0.01 | − 0.15 | 0.880 |
K | − 0.19 | 0.07 | − 2.69 | 0.007* |
Treatment (deliced) | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.51 | 0.612 |