Table 5 Output of GLMs used to compare location-specific detection probabilities of acoustic-tagged lake sturgeon 0–14 days post-release and simultaneously-observed conspecifics tagged in prior years
Phase | Model | IV(s) | df | AICc | w | D* (P) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | 1 | Null (intercept only) | 17 | 126.0 | 0.00 | 67.9 (<0.01) |
2 | Release group | 16 | 124.9 | 0.00 | 64.3 (<0.01) | |
3 | Year | 15 | 131.2 | 0.00 | 67.7 (<0.01) | |
4 | Location | 15 | 88.9 | 0.19 | 25.4 (0.04) | |
II | 5 | Location, release group | 14 | 88.2 | 0.28 | 21.3 (0.09) |
6 | Location, year | 13 | 96.0 | 0.01 | 25.2 (0.02) | |
III | 7 | Location, release group, year | 12 | 96.4 | 0.00 | 20.9 (0.05) |
IV | 8 | Location, release group, location × release group | 12 | 86.9 | 0.53 | 11.4 (0.49) |
9 | Location, release group, year, location × release group | 10 | 98.9 | 0.00 | 11.1 (0.35) | |
10 | Location, release group, year, location × year | 8 | 119.8 | 0.00 | 12.6 (0.13) | |
11 | Location, release group, year, release group × year | 10 | 108.6 | 0.00 | 20.8 (0.02) |