Table 5 Performance of error correction techniques applied to raw RAPT data of an acoustically tagged lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) in three different lakes at the Experimental Lakes Area
From: A method of spatial correction for acoustic positioning biotelemetry
Location | Scenario | Distance travelled (m) | 100 % MCP area (ha) | Core area (ha) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Lake 373 | Raw data | 4089.8 | 5.95 | 3.6 |
SSM only | 3278.3 | 5.38 | 3.47 | |
Kriged data | 4924.8 | 8.31 | 4.53 | |
Kriged and SSM | 4051.1 | 7.74 | 4.36 | |
Lake 375 | Raw data | 4839.2 | 18.55 | 12.13 |
SSM only | 3294.2 | 12.63 | 10.93 | |
Kriged data | 4675.9 | 17.53 | 13 | |
Kriged and SSM | 3250.5 | 13.89 | 11.67 | |
Lake 626 | Raw data | 5672.1 | 24.38 | 8.89 |
SSM only | 5462.5 | 23.98 | 8.75 | |
Kriged data | 5847.3 | 25.56 | 9.31 | |
Kriged and SSM | 5392.1 | 24.88 | 8.75 |