Skip to main content

Table 2 Case Study 1: Summary movement and activity space metrics calculated for four species at multiple sites within Australia

From: A standardised framework for analysing animal detections from automated tracking arrays

Species

Number of animals tagged (n)

Site of animal release

Area of site array (km2)

Step dispersal metrics (km)

Brownian bridge KUD (km2)

Mean step dispersal distance

Maximum step dispersal distance

Mean core activity space (50% contour)

Mean extent of activity space (95% contour)

Grey Reef Shark (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos)

14

North

51.67

0.16 ± 0.04

2.09 ± 0.36

0.79 ± 0.36

10.65 ± 1.99

13

South

326.91

0.72 ± 0.55

21.65 ± 7.42

1.48 ± 0.48

30.31 ± 11.36

Bull Shark (Carcharhinus leucas)

14

North

917.62

3.66 ± 1.62

405.67 ± 260.11

1857.19 ± 274.32

9049.31 ± 1888.96

14

South

3839.43

4.43 ± 1.74

735.34 ± 134.89

49,289.13 ± 38,812.96

263,531.2 ± 180,512.6

Yellowfin Bream (Acanthopagrus australis)

16

North

1121.15

7.28 ± 4.76

84.35 ± 25.42

0.87 ± 0.42

8.09 ± 4.59

12

South

951.12

0.28 ± 0.13

41.75 ± 19.36

7.63 ± 6.53

30.98 ± 29.50

Yellowtail Kingfish (Seriola lalandi)

14

North

2111.19

2.06 ± 1.51

82.76 ± 29.66

5.01 ± 2.27

126.28 ± 50.02

10

South

2267.13

11.99 ± 10.48

200.47 ± 76.28

14,988.99 ± 14,988.85

104,264.4 ± 104,262.6

  1. Northern and southern release sites for each species are represented in Fig. 2. Mean ± SD of step dispersal metrics and KUD estimates across individuals tagged at each release site. The area of site arrays was estimated by calculating the area encompassing the listening ranges of all receivers within each regional installation. Area of site array was incorporated within each ANOVA comparison presented in Fig. 2