Skip to main content

Table 4 Multiple criteria decision making matrix showing the four weighted criteria against the four main problems identified from the baseline data

From: Mind the gap—optimizing satellite tag settings for time series analysis of foraging dives in Cuvier’s beaked whales (Ziphius cavirostris)

Problem

Criteria

 

Effect on time series foraging analysis for BRS

Ease to solve

Effect on other tag functions

Speed to solve

4

2

2

2

Gaps due to tag position preventing transmissions

Low: experienced tagger ensured good tag placement

Low: tags are attached remotely

Medium: all data streams are compromised if tag is poorly positioned

Low: limited number of deployments each season

 

4 × 1 = 4

2 × 1 = 2

2 × 2 = 4

2 × 1 = 2

12

Gaps due to too much data recorded to receive

High: current programming schedule is collecting more daily messages than can be received

High: change programming schedule to reduce data amount

High: loss of data across all data streams

High: tags can be programmed before next deployment

 

4 × 3 = 12

2 × 3 = 6

2 × 3 = 6

2 × 3 = 6

30

Gaps due to not enough transmissions per day

Low: daily transmission limit was not reached in baseline tags

Low: daily transmission limit was not reached in baseline tags

Medium: changing transmission number will impact battery life

Low: no other options to receive data

 

4 × 1 = 4

2 × 1 = 2

2 × 2 = 4

2 × 1 = 2

12

Gaps due to animal surfacing behavior affecting reception rate

High: behavior affects message number

Medium: no way to control animal behavior, but can change programming schedule

Medium: behavior effects how all data streams are received

Medium: no way to control animal behavior, but can change programming schedule

 

4 × 3 = 12

2 × 2 = 4

2 × 2 = 4

2 × 2 = 4

24

  1. Criteria numbers are weighted to a maximum of ten based on relative importance. Allocations in the matrix are based on a rating of high, medium and low allocating 3, 2, and 1 points, respectively