Problem | Criteria | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Effect on time series foraging analysis for BRS | Ease to solve | Effect on other tag functions | Speed to solve | ||
4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
Gaps due to tag position preventing transmissions | Low: experienced tagger ensured good tag placement | Low: tags are attached remotely | Medium: all data streams are compromised if tag is poorly positioned | Low: limited number of deployments each season | |
4 × 1 = 4 | 2 × 1 = 2 | 2 × 2 = 4 | 2 × 1 = 2 | 12 | |
Gaps due to too much data recorded to receive | High: current programming schedule is collecting more daily messages than can be received | High: change programming schedule to reduce data amount | High: loss of data across all data streams | High: tags can be programmed before next deployment | |
4 × 3 = 12 | 2 × 3 = 6 | 2 × 3 = 6 | 2 × 3 = 6 | 30 | |
Gaps due to not enough transmissions per day | Low: daily transmission limit was not reached in baseline tags | Low: daily transmission limit was not reached in baseline tags | Medium: changing transmission number will impact battery life | Low: no other options to receive data | |
4 × 1 = 4 | 2 × 1 = 2 | 2 × 2 = 4 | 2 × 1 = 2 | 12 | |
Gaps due to animal surfacing behavior affecting reception rate | High: behavior affects message number | Medium: no way to control animal behavior, but can change programming schedule | Medium: behavior effects how all data streams are received | Medium: no way to control animal behavior, but can change programming schedule | |
4 × 3 = 12 | 2 × 2 = 4 | 2 × 2 = 4 | 2 × 2 = 4 | 24 |