Skip to main content

Table 2 Accuracy, precision, and recall for the top algorithm, window size, and summary statistics for Crotalus horridus, C. oreganus, and C. viridis. Behaviours included in these models were swallow, locomotion, and still

From: How to study a predator that only eats a few meals a year: high-frequency accelerometry to quantify feeding behaviours of rattlesnakes (Crotalus spp.)

Species

Window size (s)

Summary statistics

Algorithm

Classification performance

Swallow

Still

Locomotion

Weighted average

C. horridus

3

All

RF

Accuracy

90.83

83.11

81.54

85.16

    

Precision

87.12

81.61

66.57

78.43

    

Recall

85.38

67.41

81.23

78.00

C. oreganus

6

All

RF

Accuracy

93.62

99.57

94.04

95.74

    

Precision

90.06

98.69

92.31

93.69

    

Recall

91.19

100.00

90.00

93.73

C. viridis

3

All

RF

Accuracy

88.2

97.35

89.79

91.78

    

Precision

88.32

94.3

81.12

87.91

    

Recall

74.2

97.95

90.79

87.65

  1. The weighted average across each behaviour is also denoted
  2. RF random forest