Skip to main content

Table 3 Accuracy, precision, and recall for the top algorithm, window size, and summary statistics for Crotalus horridus, C. oreganus, and C. viridis

From: How to study a predator that only eats a few meals a year: high-frequency accelerometry to quantify feeding behaviours of rattlesnakes (Crotalus spp.)

Species

Window size (s)

Summary statistics

Algorithm

Classification performance

Strike

Still

Locomotion

Weighted average

C. horridus

0.4

All

RF

Accuracy

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

    

Precision

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

    

Recall

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

C. oreganus

0.4

All

RF

Accuracy

99.45

100.00

99.45

99.64

    

Precision

100.00

100.00

98.25

99.42

    

Recall

98.39

100.00

100.00

99.46

C. viridis

0.4

All

RF

Accuracy

97.87

100.00

97.87

98.58

    

Precision

100.00

100.00

94.12

98.04

    

Recall

93.33

100.00

100.00

97.78

  1. Behaviours included in these models were strike, locomotion, and still. The weighted average across each behaviour is also denoted
  2. RF random forest