Skip to main content

Table 5 Overall accuracy (i.e., percent correctness) of each test and the precision, recall, and F1-scores for each behavioural classification when applying top strike algorithm for each species of Crotalus to the two other species

From: How to study a predator that only eats a few meals a year: high-frequency accelerometry to quantify feeding behaviours of rattlesnakes (Crotalus spp.)

Species model

Tested species

Window size (s)

Summary statistics

Algorithm

Classification performance

Strike

Still

Locomotion

Weighted average

Overall accuracy

C. horridus

C. oreganus

0.4

All

RF

Precision

1.00

0.38

0.49

0.62

0.63

     

Recall

0.88

0.02

1.00

0.63

 
     

F1-score

0.93

0.05

0.65

0.54

 

C. horridus

C. viridis

0.4

All

RF

Precision

1.00

0.00

0.45

0.48

0.55

     

Recall

0.73

0.00

0.91

0.55

 
     

F1-score

0.85

0.00

0.60

0.48

 

C. oreganus

C. horridus

0.4

All

RF

Precision

0.4

0.00

0.78

0.39

0.46

     

Recall

1.00

0.00

0.39

0.46

 
     

F1-score

0.57

0.00

0.52

0.36

 

C. oreganus

C. viridis

0.4

All

RF

Precision

0.34

0.00

0.89

0.41

0.36

     

Recall

0.99

0.00

0.09

0.36

 
     

F1-score

0.51

0.00

0.16

0.22

 

C. viridis

C. horridus

0.4

All

RF

Precision

0.75

0.00

0.60

0.45

0.67

     

Recall

1.00

0.00

1.00

0.67

 
     

F1-score

0.86

0.00

0.75

0.54

 

C. viridis

C. oreganus

0.4

All

RF

Precision

1.00

0.56

0.93

0.83

0.73

     

Recall

0.98

1.00

0.21

0.73

 
     

F1-score

0.99

0.72

0.35

0.68

 
  1. The top algorithm, window size, summary statistics, and weighted averages are also denoted
  2. RF random forest