Open Access

Diving behaviour of the critically endangered tope shark Galeorhinus galeus in the Natural Reserve of Bahia San Blas, northern Patagonia

Animal Biotelemetry20142:11

https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-3385-2-11

Received: 11 February 2014

Accepted: 3 June 2014

Published: 10 July 2014

Abstract

Background

Tope sharks (Galeorhinus galeus) aggregate in large numbers during spring and summer in closed gulfs and bays in northern Patagonia; these locations are considered the main nursery areas for the species. However, little is known about the spatial ecology or diel behaviour of this critically endangered species. The aim was to evaluate the short-term diving behaviour and habitat preferences of tope sharks using electronic tagging.

Findings

Five female tope sharks, four adult and one sub-adult, were tagged with pop-up satellite archival tags in the Natural Reserve of Bahía San Blas, northern Patagonia, during spring 2011 and 2012. High-resolution archived data were collected for 40 days, including 29 days for two recovered tags. Sharks travelled up to 51.2 km after release. Archived data indicated that female tope sharks preferred to remain within 24.5 m of the surface and that there were no diel changes in preference. Individuals spent most of the time within 10 m of the surface during the day (80%) and at night (83%), and were primarily in water between 17°C and 19°C (day, 75%; night, 70%). Moreover, tope sharks exhibited vertical oscillatory movement (‘yo-yo diving’). Maximum vertical speeds and dive depths were recorded at night. Ascents from depth had a greater speed than descents, overall.

Conclusions

Female tope sharks were found in shallow coastal areas during November at Bahía San Blas, near the surface at relatively restricted depths and temperatures. Longer tracking periods will be important for describing the species’ migratory movements across the south-west Atlantic.

Keywords

Argentina Marine protected areas Pop-up satellite archival transmitter ‘yo-yo diving’

Introduction

The use of shark satellite tagging has increased over the past decade, facilitating the description of migratory patterns, habitat use and diving behaviour for a variety of species [1, 2]. Behavioural data provided by these telemetry studies provide valuable information for the management of this vulnerable group of fishes [1].

The tope shark, Galeorhinus galeus, is a transient coastal species [3] distributed between Brazil and Argentina in the south-west Atlantic Ocean [4]. It has been hypothesized that tope sharks comprise a single population across Argentina, Uruguay and Brazil, migrating between southern Brazil and northern Patagonia during spring [5, 6]. As a result of the large shark aggregations in closed gulfs and bays of northern Patagonia during spring and summer, these areas are believed to be the primary nursery grounds for the species [57].

In the south-west Atlantic Ocean, tope sharks are classified as critically endangered [8], largely as a result of overfishing. This study provides the first observations of short-term diving behaviour and habitat preferences of G. galeus in northern Patagonia and the south-west Atlantic Ocean.

Methods

Study site

Bahia Anegada and Bahia Unión are shallow (less than 2 m during high tides) areas inside the Natural Reserve of Bahía San Blas (NRBSB), with sandbanks, small inner rivers, natural channels and small islands in the northern zone (Figure 1). The northern edge of the NRBSB is highly influenced by discharges of nutrient-rich waters from the Colorado River and the southern edge receives nutrients from the Negro River [9]. The resulting abundance of food coupled with a scarcity of large predators make these bays important spawning and nursery areas for bony [10] and cartilaginous fishes [5, 11].
Figure 1

Tagging site (1 to 5) and pop- off location (1′ to 3′). Solid line: limits of the NRBSB.

Tagging task

Five individuals were tagged inside the NRBSB in November 2011 and 2012 (Figure 1). The sharks were captured with sport fishing gear using barbless hooks baited with mackerel (Scomber scombrus) or Brazilian menhaden (Brevoortia aurea). The length (total length) and sex of each individual was recorded before external application of an MK10 pop-up satellite archival transmitter (PSAT) tag [12]. The first three individuals were tagged on the right side of the base of the dorsal fin with a stainless steel harpoon with the tag secured intramuscularly by a polymer dart. The next two individuals were tagged using a plastic sheep ear ID tag to anchor the PSAT on the front side of the dorsal fin. The PSAT tags were programmed for a deployment period of either 180 days (Sharks 1 to 3) or 270 days (Sharks 4 and 5). Tags were programmed to record water temperature, depth and light level at 5-s intervals. These data were automatically binned into 6-hour histograms (depth bins: the first bin for depths shallower than 10 m, then bins at 10-m increments, 10 to 20 m and so on, and the last bin for depths greater than 200 m; temperature bins: the first bin for temperatures below 3°C, then bins at 2° increments, 3°C to 5°C and so on, then the last bin for temperatures above 27°C). The automatic release feature was to be triggered if tags recorded depth variations of ±3 m for 48 hours at a constant depth.

Data analysis

Igor Pro Version 6.2 (WaveMetrics) and the Data Analysis Program 3.0 (Wildlife Computers) were used to analyze the tracking data. Depth and temperature preference distribution histograms during day and night periods were constructed. The vertical speed of ascents and descents as well as maximum dive depths were calculated from depth profiles (Sharks 1 and 2) during the day, at night, and at sunset and sunrise. Local hour intervals were defined as: 9 to 10, 12 to 13, 15 to 16 (day) and 21 to 22, 0 to 1, 3 to 4 (night). The sunset and sunrise period at the study area were obtained from dawn and dusk data for the tracking period using the Navy Hydrographic Service. Vertical speed and dive depths were defined, assuming constant speed for straight ascent and descent movements (0° and 45°) between two consecutive points.

Ethical approval

As Galeorhinus galeus is fished and commercialized in Argentina, it is regulated by fishery acts. This work was carried out according to the code of good practice for sustainable recreational fisheries suggested by the management plan (not implemented yet) of the Natural Reserve of Bahía San Blas, in compliance with act N° 217/07 for sustainable angling fishing in the Province of Buenos Aires for coastal sharks.

Results

Five female G. galeus (122 to 140 cm total length) were tagged in the NRBSB, northern Patagonia (Table 1). The first two tags were recovered and full archival datasets were downloaded (696 hours). Tag 3 transmitted 1,917 messages but the remaining two tags failed. Movement behaviour was tracked for a total of 40 days. All sharks remained within the limits of the NRBSB until the tags popped off (Figure 1). Complete tagging and pop-off details are reported in Table 1. The tracked sharks had a limited vertical distribution near the surface layer and also swam in waters within a narrow temperature range (Figures 2 and 3). All sharks swam 80% of the day and 83% of the night at depths shallower than 10 m. The remainder of the time was spent between 10 m and 20 m (day, 20%; night, 16.5%) or between 20 m and 30 m (day and night <1%). The tracked sharks swam predominantly in water that was between 17°C and 19°C (day, 75%; night, 70%). Other temperatures logged were 19°C to 21°C (day, 24%; night, 28%) and 15°C to 17°C (day, 0.5%; night, 2%). Shark 2 (mean, 6.48 ± 4.40 m) exhibited a wider range of depth use than did shark 1 (mean, 2.57 m, ± 1.84), and a wider thermal range (Figure 4). Sharks swam near the surface (0.5 to 0.0 m) for the most part, with maximums of 9 (Shark 1) and 41 min (Shark 2) and a vertical oscillatory movement changing depth over a short period of time (<1 min), termed ‘yo-yo diving’, was recorded (Sharks 1 and 2). Shark 1 swam exclusively in depths <10 m, mostly at 1 to 2 m during both day and night (Figure 5). Sharks 1 and 2 used areas with similar water temperatures (18.79 ± 0.67°C, and 18.89 ± 0.50°C, respectively). The maximum vertical speeds and dive depths were recorded at night (Additional file 1: Table S1) and overall ascending movements (3.36 ± 0.17 m and 3.40 ± 0.08 m for Sharks 1 and 2, respectively) were larger than descending movements (2.34 ± 0.24 m and 2.50 ± 0.26 m, for Sharks 1 and 2, respectively, Additional file 2: Figure S1 and Additional file 3: Figure S2).
Table 1

Tagging information for Galeorhinus galeus

Shark number

Tagging depth (m)

Tagging date

Tagging location

Pop-off date

Pop-off location

Distance moved (km)

Note

1

5

11/11/2011

40° 7′ 37.78″ S 62° 16′ 37.05″ W

19/11/2011

39° 59′ 34.80″ S 62° 1′ 51.60″ W

19.4

Tag recovered

2

2.5

13/11/2011

39° 56′ 49.61″ S 62° 14′ 31.85″ W

04/12/2011

40° 11′ 9.60″ S 61° 54′ 46.80″ W

29.91* 48.68#

Tag recovered

3

2.5

13/11/2011

40° 7′ 28.16″ S 62° 16′ 8.56″ W

24/11/2011

40° 33′ 54.00″ S 61° 56′ 27.60″ W

51.12

Tag not recovered

4

2

18/11/2011

40° 7′ 42.97″ S 62° 16′ 11.88″ W

Expected date 18/6/13

-

-

Tag failed

5

2

18/11/2011

40° 7′ 38.59″ S 62° 15 49.08″ W

Expected date 18/6/13

-

-

Tag failed

*, minimum distance travelled; #, maximum distance travelled.

Figure 2

Full archival record of Shark 1 during the tracking period. Shaded bars indicate night time.

Figure 3

Full archival record of Shark 2 during the tracking period. Shaded bars indicate night time.

Figure 4

Temperature and depth profile for Shark 1 (grey ), Shark 2 () and both sharks ().

Figure 5

Detailed histogram of percentage time-at-depth for Shark 1 and Shark 2.

Discussion

The deployment time for PSATs attached to Sharks 1, 2 and 3 was less than the programmed deployment period because the tag pin burnt out prematurely when the sharks had remained at 6 ± 3 m deep for 48 hours. As the sharks mostly frequented shallow and turbid coastal waters, it was not possible to estimate geolocation based on light-level data.

Vertical movements

During the tracking period, tagged G. galeus exhibited regular oscillatory movements in which they rapidly changed depth (<1 min.). Explanations for this so called ‘yo-yo’ diving [13] could include searching for cues [14] or for prey, such as striped weakfish (Cynoscion guatucupa), which are abundant in the NRBSB during November [11]. Although, tracked G. galeus swam in shallow depths in the NRBSB, they showed higher ascending and descending speeds than similar-sized females in Australia [15].

Depth distribution

In Golfo Nuevo, Patagonia, Elías et al. [7] caught male (40 m) and female tope sharks (>110 m) at greater depths than those in which tope sharks frequented in the NRBSB. However, G. galeus is fished at similar depths to those used in our study (6 to 15 m and 20 to 30 m) in Uruguay [6]. In southern Brazil, G. galeus are abundant at depths between 40 and 350 m and have been recorded at depths up to 375 m [16]. In southern Australia, West and Stevens [15] found that G. galeus spent 91% of their time on the continental shelf (<200 m), with a peak at 50 to 75 m for females and 75 to 100 m for males. The relatively shallow depths that tope sharks utilized during this study might be an artefact of the short period of time tracked, as sharks remained close to the coast and inside the NRBSB for most of the tracking period. Surface swimming behaviour for prolonged periods (hours to days or weeks) has been observed in G. galeus in southern Australia [15]; however, we only recorded surface swimming for periods shorter than 1 hour.

Temperature preferences

In Golfo Nuevo, females were caught in deeper (>110 m) and cooler (11°C to 12°C) waters than those used by female tope sharks in the NRBSB [7]. Female tope sharks experience similar temperatures in southern Brazilian waters from April to June (18°C to 20°C) [17]. In Uruguay, De Buen [18] found lower temperature preferences (15.9°C to 14°C) than our study. West and Stevens [15] showed that tope sharks from southern Australia spent 63% of their time in cooler waters (13°C to 16°C), and 30% in a similar temperature range (16°C to 20°C) to tope sharks in the NRBSB.

Conclusions

Within the NRBSB, female Galeorhinus galeus exhibited oscillating diving behaviour in a narrow depth and temperature range and resided primarily near the surface. Surface swimming behaviour and ‘yo-yo diving’ were also observed. Longer tracking periods will be necessary to confirm regional migratory movements across the species’ entire distribution for the successful development of an effective coordinated Regional Species Conservation Plan for the south-west Atlantic population.

Abbreviations

NRBSB: 

Natural Reserve of Bahía San Blas

PSAT: 

Pop-up satellite archival transmitter.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Luis and Leo Carbone, Hugo Reisvig, Gustavo Chiaramonte, Phillipe Miller, Matias Braccini, Naomi Pleizier and Robert Lennox.

Funding

JMC was supported by a scholarship from Universidad National de La Matanza. This work was supported by a Rufford Small Grant (No 9515-1) and The Mohamed Bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund (No 11252181).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Instituto de Medio Ambiente, Universidad Nacional de la Matanza
(2)
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata
(3)
Grupo de Estudio de Peces Cartilaginosos CONDROS, Instituto de Biología Marina y Pesquera Alte, Storni, Universidad Nacional de Comahue
(4)
CONICET, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones, Científicas y Técnicas
(5)
Universidad Nacional del Comahue

References

  1. Hammerschlag N, Gallagher AJ, Lazarre DM: A review of shark satellite tagging studies. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 2011, 398: 1–8. 10.1016/j.jembe.2010.12.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Papastamatiou YP, Lowe CG: An analytical and hypothesis-driven approach to elasmobranch movement studies. J Fish Biol 2012, 80: 1342–1360. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03232.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Speed C, Field I, Meekan M, Bradshaw C: Complexities of coastal shark movements and their implications for management. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2010, 408: 275–293.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiaramonte GE: Biología y pesquería del tiburón vitamínico Galeorhinus galeus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Pisces Elasmobranchii: Triakidae) en Puerto Quequén. Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires; 2001:70.Google Scholar
  5. Lucifora LO, Menni RC, Escalante AH: Reproductive biology of the school shark, Galeorhinus galeus , off Argentina: support for a single south western Atlantic population with synchronized migratory movements. Environ Biol Fishes 2004, 71: 199–209. 10.1007/s10641-004-0305-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Walker T: Galeorhinus galeus fisheries of the world. In Case Studies of the Management of Elasmobranch Fisheries. Edited by: Shotton R. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization; 1999:728–773.Google Scholar
  7. Elías I, Rodriguez A, Hasan E, Reyna MV, Amoroso R: Biological observations of the tope shark, Galeorhinus galeus , in the northern Patagonian gulfs of Argentina. J Northwest Atl Fish Sci 2004,37(December 2004):261–265.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Galeorhinus galeus [http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/39352/0]
  9. Guerrero RA, Lasta CA: Oceanografía física del estuario del Río de la Plata y el sistema costero de El Rincón. In Resultados de una Campaña de Evaluación de Recursos Demersales Costeros de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Volume 21. Buenos Aires, Argentina: INIDEP Informe Técnico; 1998:29–54.Google Scholar
  10. Macchi G, Acha M: Aspectos reproductivos de las principales especies de peces en la Zona Común de Pesca Argentino-Uruguaya y en El Rincón. November 1994. In Resultados de una Campaña de Evaluación de Recursos Demersales Costeros de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Volume 21. Buenos Aires, Argentina: INIDEP Informe Técnico; 1998:67–89.Google Scholar
  11. Lucifora LO: Ecología y Conservación de los Grandes Tiburones Costeros de Bahía Anegada. Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata; 2003:410.Google Scholar
  12. Wildlife Computers: Innovative Tags for Innovative Research [http://www.wildlifecomputers.com]
  13. Carey FG, Scharold JV: Movements of blue sharks (Prionace glauca) in depth and course. Mar Biol 1990, 106: 329–342. 10.1007/BF01344309View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Nakamura I, Watanabe Y, Papastamatiou Y, Sato K, Meyer C: Yo-yo vertical movements suggest a foraging strategy for tiger sharks Galeocerdo cuvier. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2011, 424: 237–246.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. West GJ, Stevens JD: The Use of Archival Tags for Studying the Movement and Swimming Behaviour of School Sharks. Deakin, Australian Capital Territory: Fisheries Research & Development Corporation (Australia); 2001.Google Scholar
  16. Peres M, Vooren C: Sexual development, reproductive cycle, and fecundity of the school shark Galeorhinus galeus off southern Brazil. Fish Bull 1991, 89: 655–667.Google Scholar
  17. Ferreira BP, Vooren CM: Age, growth, and structure of vertebra in the school shark Galeorhinus galeus (Linnaeus, 1758) from Southern Brazil. Fish Bull 1991, 89: 19–31.Google Scholar
  18. de Buen F: Contribuciones a la ictiología II: El tiburón vitamínico de la costa Uruguaya, Galeorhinus Vitaminicus nov. sp., y Algunas Consideraciones Generales Sobre Su Biología. Publicaciones Cientificas, Servicio Oceanografico y de Pesca, Ministerio de Industrias y Trabajo, Montevideo 1950, 4: 153–162.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Cuevas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement